Magnifier Search

Railroad Development Corporation v. Guatemala

Type of decisionSecond Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction
Date of decision18 May 2010
Tribunal
Andrés Rigo Sureda (President)
James R. Crawford
Stuart E. Eizenstat
Legal instrumentDominican Republic – Central America Free Trade Agreement
Related decision(s)
Further informationFull text of the decision

Statements from this decision

You are currently viewing the statements in their context. To view them in a list, click here.
It does not matter whether an IIT refers to domestic law only within individual paragraphs of its list of forms of investment; it is to be expected that investments made in a country will meet the relevant legal requirements
On assessing an act, which took place before the IIT entered into force, one must distinguish between an act of continuing character and an already completed act continuing to cause loss or damage
It is necessary to distinguish the date when a dispute starts from the facts leading to it

Feedback

Above you will find 3 statement(s) from this decision. Please note that when viewing the statements in their context, the same statement may appear multiple times if it is relevant for more than one topic. Did we miss something? Feel free to send us your suggestions!